Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Burbank
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Burbank (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,235 | 104,765 |
Income (median) | $58,400 | $57,804 |
Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $574,300 |
White | 69% | 70% |
Black | 2% | 2% |
Asian | 14% | 11% |
With Kids | 31% | 27% |
Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
Rentals | 29% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Burbank?
A: Laguna Hills has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 31235 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z