Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Belmont
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 69% | 62% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 14% | 27% |
| With Kids | 31% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Belmont?
A: Laguna Hills has a similar population count than Belmont: 31235 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z