Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Hills to Altadena
This post compares Laguna Hills, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Laguna Hills (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 31,235 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $58,400 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $649,700 | $649,800 |
| White | 69% | 53% |
| Black | 2% | 22% |
| Asian | 14% | 6% |
| With Kids | 31% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 43 |
| Rentals | 29% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Hills or Altadena?
A: Laguna Hills has a smaller population count than Altadena: 31235 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Hills or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Laguna Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Hills or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Laguna Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Altadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 29% for Laguna Hills versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Hills may include: San-Dimas, Glendora, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z