Compare-Cities.com
Compare Laguna Beach to San Francisco
This post compares Laguna Beach, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Laguna Beach (city) | San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,224 | 864,263 |
Income (median) | $100,466 | $74,841 |
Home Value (median) | $1,570,700 | $927,400 |
White | 88% | 47% |
Black | 0% | 5% |
Asian | 4% | 34% |
With Kids | 21% | 18% |
Age (median) | 50 | 38 |
Rentals | 37% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Laguna Beach or San Francisco?
A: Laguna Beach has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 23224 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Laguna Beach or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Laguna Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Laguna Beach or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Laguna Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 37% for Laguna Beach versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Laguna Beach may include: Newport-Beach, Los-Gatos, and Manhattan-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z