Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to South San Francisco
This post compares La Verne, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | La Verne (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 32,320 | 67,120 |
Income (median) | $57,816 | $52,696 |
Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $697,400 |
White | 74% | 33% |
Black | 4% | 2% |
Asian | 7% | 39% |
With Kids | 30% | 34% |
Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
Rentals | 25% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or South San Francisco?
A: La Verne has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 32320 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z