Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to San Bruno
This post compares La Verne, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $754,700 |
| White | 74% | 49% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 7% | 28% |
| With Kids | 30% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 39 |
| Rentals | 25% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or San Bruno?
A: La Verne has a smaller population count than San Bruno: 32320 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z