Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Riverbank
This post compares La Verne, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $247,200 |
| White | 74% | 79% |
| Black | 4% | 0% |
| Asian | 7% | 4% |
| With Kids | 30% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 32 |
| Rentals | 25% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Riverbank?
A: La Verne has a larger population count than Riverbank: 32320 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Riverbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z