Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares La Verne, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $444,200 |
| White | 74% | 62% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 30% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 25% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: La Verne has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 32320 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z