Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Pittsburg
This post compares La Verne, California to Pittsburg, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Pittsburg (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 69,449 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $46,928 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $324,500 |
| White | 74% | 33% |
| Black | 4% | 16% |
| Asian | 7% | 17% |
| With Kids | 30% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 35 |
| Rentals | 25% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Pittsburg?
A: La Verne has a much smaller population count than Pittsburg: 32320 compared with 69449 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Pittsburg?
A: Incomes are on average higher in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Pittsburg?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pittsburg does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 43% for Pittsburg.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z