Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Fresno
This post compares La Verne, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $206,800 |
| White | 74% | 56% |
| Black | 4% | 7% |
| Asian | 7% | 13% |
| With Kids | 30% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 30 |
| Rentals | 25% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Fresno?
A: La Verne has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 32320 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z