Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Foster City
This post compares La Verne, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 74% | 43% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 47% |
| With Kids | 30% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 40 |
| Rentals | 25% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Foster City?
A: La Verne has a similar population count than Foster City: 32320 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z