Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Foothill Farms
This post compares La Verne, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | La Verne (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 32,320 | 33,627 |
Income (median) | $57,816 | $39,925 |
Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $201,200 |
White | 74% | 67% |
Black | 4% | 9% |
Asian | 7% | 5% |
With Kids | 30% | 38% |
Age (median) | 43 | 33 |
Rentals | 25% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Foothill Farms?
A: La Verne has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 32320 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z