Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Folsom
This post compares La Verne, California to Folsom, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Folsom (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 75,897 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $84,884 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $456,600 |
| White | 74% | 69% |
| Black | 4% | 4% |
| Asian | 7% | 16% |
| With Kids | 30% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 40 |
| Rentals | 25% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Folsom?
A: La Verne has a much smaller population count than Folsom: 32320 compared with 75897 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Folsom?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Folsom?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Folsom does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 25% for La Verne versus 30% for Folsom.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z