Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Fairfield
This post compares La Verne, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $341,500 |
| White | 74% | 46% |
| Black | 4% | 14% |
| Asian | 7% | 17% |
| With Kids | 30% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 34 |
| Rentals | 25% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Fairfield?
A: La Verne has a much smaller population count than Fairfield: 32320 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z