Compare-Cities.com
Compare La Verne to Eureka
This post compares La Verne, California to Eureka, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | La Verne (city) | Eureka (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 32,320 | 27,024 |
| Income (median) | $57,816 | $33,280 |
| Home Value (median) | $535,900 | $249,300 |
| White | 74% | 75% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 7% |
| With Kids | 30% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 43 | 37 |
| Rentals | 25% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, La Verne or Eureka?
A: La Verne has a similar population count than Eureka: 32320 compared with 27024 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in La Verne or in Eureka?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in La Verne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in La Verne or Eureka?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in La Verne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Eureka does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for La Verne versus 54% for Eureka.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to La Verne may include: Glendora, Casa-de-Oro-Mount-Helix, and Camarillo.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z