Compare-Cities.com
Compare Imperial Beach to Foothill Farms
This post compares Imperial Beach, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Imperial Beach (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,270 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $39,262 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $433,400 | $201,200 |
| White | 71% | 67% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 8% | 5% |
| With Kids | 37% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 31 | 33 |
| Rentals | 68% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Imperial Beach or Foothill Farms?
A: Imperial Beach has a similar population count than Foothill Farms: 27270 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Imperial Beach or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Imperial Beach.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Imperial Beach or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Imperial Beach.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Imperial Beach does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 68% for Imperial Beach versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Imperial Beach may include: El-Cajon, Port-Hueneme, and Seaside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z