Compare-Cities.com
Compare Highland to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Highland, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Highland (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,704 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $44,274 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $288,500 | $322,800 |
| White | 58% | 36% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 10% |
| With Kids | 46% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 32 |
| Rentals | 35% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Highland or South San Jose Hills?
A: Highland has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 54704 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Highland or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Highland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Highland or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Highland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Highland does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Highland versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Highland may include: Antelope, San-Jacinto, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z