Compare-Cities.com
Compare Highland to South San Francisco
This post compares Highland, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Highland (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,704 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $44,274 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $288,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 58% | 33% |
| Black | 8% | 2% |
| Asian | 9% | 39% |
| With Kids | 46% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Highland or South San Francisco?
A: Highland has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 54704 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Highland or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Highland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Highland or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Highland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Highland versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Highland may include: Antelope, San-Jacinto, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z