Compare-Cities.com
Compare Highland to South Pasadena
This post compares Highland, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Highland (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,704 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $44,274 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $288,500 | $928,500 |
| White | 58% | 54% |
| Black | 8% | 3% |
| Asian | 9% | 29% |
| With Kids | 46% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 35% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Highland or South Pasadena?
A: Highland has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 54704 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Highland or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Highland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Highland or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Highland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Highland versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Highland may include: Antelope, San-Jacinto, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z