Compare-Cities.com
Compare Highland to San Francisco
This post compares Highland, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Highland (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,704 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $44,274 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $288,500 | $927,400 |
| White | 58% | 47% |
| Black | 8% | 5% |
| Asian | 9% | 34% |
| With Kids | 46% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 38 |
| Rentals | 35% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Highland or San Francisco?
A: Highland has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 54704 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Highland or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Highland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Highland or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Highland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Highland versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Highland may include: Antelope, San-Jacinto, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z