Compare-Cities.com
Compare Highland to San Bruno
This post compares Highland, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Highland (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 54,704 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $44,274 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $288,500 | $754,700 |
| White | 58% | 49% |
| Black | 8% | 1% |
| Asian | 9% | 28% |
| With Kids | 46% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Highland or San Bruno?
A: Highland has a larger population count than San Bruno: 54704 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Highland or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Highland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Highland or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Highland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Highland versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Highland may include: Antelope, San-Jacinto, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z