Compare-Cities.com
Compare Highland to Foothill Farms
This post compares Highland, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Highland (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 54,704 | 33,627 |
Income (median) | $44,274 | $39,925 |
Home Value (median) | $288,500 | $201,200 |
White | 58% | 67% |
Black | 8% | 9% |
Asian | 9% | 5% |
With Kids | 46% | 38% |
Age (median) | 32 | 33 |
Rentals | 35% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Highland or Foothill Farms?
A: Highland has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 54704 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Highland or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Highland.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Highland or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Highland.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Highland versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Highland may include: Antelope, San-Jacinto, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z