Compare-Cities.com
Compare Hawthorne to Redlands
This post compares Hawthorne, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Hawthorne (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,425 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $36,468 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,400 | $350,900 |
| White | 31% | 71% |
| Black | 23% | 7% |
| Asian | 7% | 7% |
| With Kids | 39% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 35 |
| Rentals | 73% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Hawthorne or Redlands?
A: Hawthorne has a similar population count than Redlands: 87425 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Hawthorne or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Hawthorne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Hawthorne or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Hawthorne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Hawthorne does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 73% for Hawthorne versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Hawthorne may include: Ashland, Bellflower, and Richmond.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z