Compare-Cities.com
Compare Hawthorne to Foster City
This post compares Hawthorne, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Hawthorne (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,425 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $36,468 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,400 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 31% | 43% |
| Black | 23% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 47% |
| With Kids | 39% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 33 | 40 |
| Rentals | 73% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Hawthorne or Foster City?
A: Hawthorne has a larger population count than Foster City: 87425 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Hawthorne or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Hawthorne.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Hawthorne or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Hawthorne.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Hawthorne does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 73% for Hawthorne versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Hawthorne may include: Ashland, Bellflower, and Richmond.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z