Compare-Cities.com
Compare Hanford to South Pasadena
This post compares Hanford, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Hanford (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,599 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $42,984 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $192,900 | $928,500 |
| White | 75% | 54% |
| Black | 4% | 3% |
| Asian | 5% | 29% |
| With Kids | 42% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 40 |
| Rentals | 43% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Hanford or South Pasadena?
A: Hanford has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 55599 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Hanford or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Hanford.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Hanford or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Hanford.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Hanford versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Hanford may include: Visalia, Brawley, and Turlock.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z