Compare-Cities.com
Compare Hanford to Pasadena
This post compares Hanford, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Hanford (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,599 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $42,984 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $192,900 | $689,700 |
| White | 75% | 53% |
| Black | 4% | 10% |
| Asian | 5% | 16% |
| With Kids | 42% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 32 | 37 |
| Rentals | 43% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Hanford or Pasadena?
A: Hanford has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 55599 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Hanford or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Hanford.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Hanford or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Hanford.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 43% for Hanford versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Hanford may include: Visalia, Brawley, and Turlock.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z