Compare-Cities.com
Compare Granite Bay to South San Francisco
This post compares Granite Bay, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Granite Bay (CDP) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,479 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $96,431 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $697,500 | $697,400 |
| White | 84% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 7% | 39% |
| With Kids | 35% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 46 | 39 |
| Rentals | 12% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Granite Bay or South San Francisco?
A: Granite Bay has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 22479 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Granite Bay or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Granite Bay.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Granite Bay or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Granite Bay.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 12% for Granite Bay versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Granite Bay may include: North-Tustin, El-Dorado-Hills, and Agoura-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z