Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendora to South San Francisco
This post compares Glendora, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendora (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 51,891 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $60,454 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $517,100 | $697,400 |
| White | 69% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 10% | 39% |
| With Kids | 33% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 29% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendora or South San Francisco?
A: Glendora has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 51891 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendora or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Glendora.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendora or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Glendora.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 29% for Glendora versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendora may include: San-Dimas, Laguna-Hills, and Lake-Forest.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z