Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to South San Francisco
This post compares Glendale, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 72% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 15% | 39% |
| With Kids | 28% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 66% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or South San Francisco?
A: Glendale has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 199750 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z