Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Selma
This post compares Glendale, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | Selma (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 24,537 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $35,716 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $171,200 |
| White | 72% | 78% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 15% | 4% |
| With Kids | 28% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 30 |
| Rentals | 66% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Selma?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Selma: 199750 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z