Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to San Francisco
This post compares Glendale, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $927,400 |
| White | 72% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 15% | 34% |
| With Kids | 28% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 38 |
| Rentals | 66% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or San Francisco?
A: Glendale has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 199750 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 66% for Glendale versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z