Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to San Bruno
This post compares Glendale, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $754,700 |
| White | 72% | 49% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 28% |
| With Kids | 28% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 66% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or San Bruno?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 199750 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z