Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Redlands
This post compares Glendale, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Glendale (city) | Redlands (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 199,750 | 70,765 |
Income (median) | $51,410 | $54,151 |
Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $350,900 |
White | 72% | 71% |
Black | 1% | 7% |
Asian | 15% | 7% |
With Kids | 28% | 33% |
Age (median) | 41 | 35 |
Rentals | 66% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Redlands?
A: Glendale has a larger population count than Redlands: 199750 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z