Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Patterson
This post compares Glendale, California to Patterson, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | Patterson (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 21,497 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $43,090 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $258,600 |
| White | 72% | 72% |
| Black | 1% | 7% |
| Asian | 15% | 4% |
| With Kids | 28% | 51% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 30 |
| Rentals | 66% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Patterson?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Patterson: 199750 compared with 21497 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Patterson?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Patterson?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 38% for Patterson.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z