Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Palm Springs
This post compares Glendale, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $340,600 |
| White | 72% | 83% |
| Black | 1% | 4% |
| Asian | 15% | 4% |
| With Kids | 28% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 54 |
| Rentals | 66% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Palm Springs?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Palm Springs: 199750 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z