Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Foster City
This post compares Glendale, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Glendale (city) | Foster City (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 199,750 | 33,529 |
Income (median) | $51,410 | $105,889 |
Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $1,051,000 |
White | 72% | 43% |
Black | 1% | 2% |
Asian | 15% | 47% |
With Kids | 28% | 33% |
Age (median) | 41 | 40 |
Rentals | 66% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Foster City?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Foster City: 199750 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z