Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Burbank
This post compares Glendale, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Glendale (city) | Burbank (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 199,750 | 104,765 |
Income (median) | $51,410 | $57,804 |
Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $574,300 |
White | 72% | 70% |
Black | 1% | 2% |
Asian | 15% | 11% |
With Kids | 28% | 27% |
Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
Rentals | 66% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Burbank?
A: Glendale has a larger population count than Burbank: 199750 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 66% for Glendale versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z