Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Beverly Hills
This post compares Glendale, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 72% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 9% |
| With Kids | 28% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 43 |
| Rentals | 66% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Beverly Hills?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 199750 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 66% for Glendale versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z