Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Belmont
This post compares Glendale, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | Belmont (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 27,110 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $107,466 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $1,174,200 |
| White | 72% | 62% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 15% | 27% |
| With Kids | 28% | 32% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 39 |
| Rentals | 66% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Belmont?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Belmont: 199750 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Glendale does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 66% for Glendale versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z