Compare-Cities.com
Compare Glendale to Ashland
This post compares Glendale, California to Ashland, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Glendale (city) | Ashland (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 199,750 | 24,477 |
| Income (median) | $51,410 | $40,407 |
| Home Value (median) | $675,300 | $396,400 |
| White | 72% | 44% |
| Black | 1% | 17% |
| Asian | 15% | 20% |
| With Kids | 28% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 41 | 32 |
| Rentals | 66% | 68% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Glendale or Ashland?
A: Glendale has a much larger population count than Ashland: 199750 compared with 24477 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Glendale or in Ashland?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Glendale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Glendale or Ashland?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Glendale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Ashland does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 66% for Glendale versus 68% for Ashland.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Glendale may include: Burbank, Monrovia, and Lomita.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z