Compare-Cities.com
Compare Galt to South San Francisco
This post compares Galt, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Galt (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,222 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $48,083 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $270,300 | $697,400 |
| White | 74% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 5% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 28% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Galt or South San Francisco?
A: Galt has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 25222 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Galt or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Galt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Galt or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Galt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Galt versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Galt may include: Wildomar, Riverbank, and Beaumont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z