Compare-Cities.com
Compare Galt to Redlands
This post compares Galt, California to Redlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Galt (city) | Redlands (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,222 | 70,765 |
| Income (median) | $48,083 | $54,151 |
| Home Value (median) | $270,300 | $350,900 |
| White | 74% | 71% |
| Black | 2% | 7% |
| Asian | 5% | 7% |
| With Kids | 43% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 28% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Galt or Redlands?
A: Galt has a much smaller population count than Redlands: 25222 compared with 70765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Galt or in Redlands?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Galt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Galt or Redlands?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Galt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Galt versus 42% for Redlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Galt may include: Wildomar, Riverbank, and Beaumont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z