Compare-Cities.com
Compare Galt to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Galt, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Galt (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,222 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $48,083 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $270,300 | $633,400 |
| White | 74% | 75% |
| Black | 2% | 1% |
| Asian | 5% | 13% |
| With Kids | 43% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 28% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Galt or Pleasant Hill?
A: Galt has a smaller population count than Pleasant Hill: 25222 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Galt or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Galt.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Galt or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Galt.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 28% for Galt versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Galt may include: Wildomar, Riverbank, and Beaumont.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z