Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Fresno, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $322,800 |
| White | 56% | 36% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 10% |
| With Kids | 41% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 53% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or South San Jose Hills?
A: Fresno has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 519037 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Fresno versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z