Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to South San Francisco
This post compares Fresno, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 56% | 33% |
| Black | 7% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 39% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 53% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or South San Francisco?
A: Fresno has a much larger population count than South San Francisco: 519037 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Fresno versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z