Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to South Pasadena
This post compares Fresno, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $928,500 |
| White | 56% | 54% |
| Black | 7% | 3% |
| Asian | 13% | 29% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 53% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or South Pasadena?
A: Fresno has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 519037 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 53% for Fresno versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z