Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Fresno, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $374,600 |
| White | 56% | 81% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 3% |
| With Kids | 41% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 38 |
| Rentals | 53% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Fresno has a much larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 519037 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 53% for Fresno versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z