Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to Riverbank
This post compares Fresno, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $247,200 |
| White | 56% | 79% |
| Black | 7% | 0% |
| Asian | 13% | 4% |
| With Kids | 41% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 53% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or Riverbank?
A: Fresno has a much larger population count than Riverbank: 519037 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Fresno versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z