Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Fresno, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $444,200 |
| White | 56% | 62% |
| Black | 7% | 9% |
| Asian | 13% | 13% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 53% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Fresno has a larger population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 519037 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Fresno versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z