Compare-Cities.com
Compare Fresno to Lincoln
This post compares Fresno, California to Lincoln, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Fresno (city) | Lincoln (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 519,037 | 46,404 |
| Income (median) | $39,069 | $59,287 |
| Home Value (median) | $206,800 | $389,900 |
| White | 56% | 81% |
| Black | 7% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 6% |
| With Kids | 41% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 53% | 21% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Fresno or Lincoln?
A: Fresno has a much larger population count than Lincoln: 519037 compared with 46404 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Fresno or in Lincoln?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Fresno.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Fresno or Lincoln?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Fresno.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 53% for Fresno versus 21% for Lincoln.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Fresno may include: Riverside, Bakersfield, and Stockton.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z